the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Numerical Models for Monitoring and Forecasting Ocean Ecosystems: a short description of present status
Abstract. Understanding and managing marine ecosystems under potential stress from human activities or climate change requires the development of models with different degree of sophistication in order to be capable of predicting changes in living components and environmental variables. Recent advances in ecosystem modelling are the focus of this paper, which reviews numerical approaches to analyse the characteristics of marine conditions in terms of typical units, i.e., individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems. In particular, it examines the current classification of numerical models of increasing complexity – from individuals and population and stock assessment models to models representing the whole ecosystem by covering all trophic levels – and presents examples and their operational maturity, finally demonstrating their use for supporting marine resource management, conservation, planning and mitigation actions.
- Preprint
(816 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on sp-2024-42', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Nov 2024
reply
The paper provides an overview of six classes of marine ecosystem models and evaluates their current status in operational applications. I acknowledge that it’s a daunting task to review these many models in such limited space, and I appreciate the author’s efforts. However, I found some aspects of the paper challenging.
- I wonder who the targeted audience for this review is. I’m afraid that the current version is not quite accessible to the wider audience, partiallydue to the use of jargon and acronyms—some of which are not explained—and by lengthy sentences from time to time. I have a background in ocean ecosystem modeling, but I have to admit that it’s not always easy to follow the description of all models. If the review is intended for a wider audience, I think it could be a bit more elementary.
- The Introduction indicates that there are “available syntheses and reviews”. How does this short description complement those previous works? A brief summary highlighting the specific focus of the previous reviews in relation to this one would help readers identify which resources best align with their interests.
- As a follow-up comment, given the limited space available for detailed information on each class of model, it would be beneficial if the author could recommend key references for further reading.
- The criteria used to assess the readiness or maturity of each class of model for operational applications could be more explicitly defined. Is it based on the model complexity, computation cost, or technical challenges in implementation?
- Given the limited space, the description of each model class is brief. The only exception is the “3 Population and stock assessment models.” It presents two complex model equations, which are a bit awkward and somewhat “too detailed” in this brief review.
Some technical corrections:
Page 2, line 31. Should be “six classes”
Page 5, line 151. What does “population dynamics under technical interactions” mean?
Page 7, line 195. “These WEM models…”
Page 15. Table. What is the gww?
Page 16. Table. Missing the “of” after the “Number”
Page 17. Table. “Ensemble” instead of “Ensamble”?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-42-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
23 | 12 | 3 | 38 | 1 | 1 |
- HTML: 23
- PDF: 12
- XML: 3
- Total: 38
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 1
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1