the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A description of Validation Processes and Techniques for Ocean Forecasting
Abstract. Operational forecasting systems architecture requires clear identification of best practices for assessing the quality of ocean products: it plays a key role not only for the qualification of predictions skill, but also for advancing in the scientific understanding of the ocean dynamics from global to coastal scales. The Authors discusses on the role of observing network for performing validation of ocean model outputs, identifying current gaps (i.e., different capacity in assessing physical essential ocean variables versus biogeochemical ones), but also emphasizing the need of new metrics (tailored for end-users comprehension and usages). An analysis on the level of maturity of validation processes from global to regional systems is provided. A rich variety of approaches exist, and the most we move towards the coast the higher is the complexity in calculating such metrics, due to increased resolution but also somehow limited by the lack of coastal observatories worldwide. It is provided as example how the Copernicus Marine Service currently organizes the product quality information from producers (with dedicated scientific documentation, properly planned and designed) to end-users (with publication of targeted estimated accuracy numbers for its whole product catalogue).
- Preprint
(616 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 Nov 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on sp-2024-33', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Oct 2024
reply
The paper is a review of the different model validation carried out by different groups. Some model has more detailed information than others.
It is striking to note the amount of details given to the Canadian system. Similar details should be done on all the different systems listed in the present work as it will enrich the readers understanding of each system as well as provide useful information which will help other groups develop their system.In term of usage of satellite data, (Line 173): are satellite data not used to validate model in the coastal region due to lack of remotely sensed data product or also due to higher uncertainty of remotely sensed coastal data?
Most important, I also suggest the authors include conclusion of their findings.
The following are minor correction:
Line 27: ETOOFS is not defined.
Line 60: Line EOV is not defined.
Line 104. I don't understand the sentence (may be missing something in the sentence)
Line 119: I suggest: "It aims to deliver a consistent, reliable, and state-of-the-art information derived from space..."
Line 132: PQ is not defined
Line 200: DA is not defined
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2024-33-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 6 | 11 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
- HTML: 18
- PDF: 6
- XML: 11
- Total: 35
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1